FAIRMol

Ligand prioritization

Interactive top-50 shortlist per target built from a transparent multi-objective workflow. It combines docking quality, absolute exposed hydrophobic atoms, low strain, safety/ecotox, synthesizability, and native-contact similarity when a native reference exists, then uses Pareto fronts plus a compromise score to expose the most balanced ligands.

DB Docking_panel_21
39 shortlisted rows 1 targets
Priority cache is ready
Stran zdaj bere že shranjene rezultate iz baze, zato je odzivna. Rebuild v ozadju uporabi, ko želiš osvežiti Pareto-kompromisni izbor za trenutno filtriran nabor.
Selection workspace
No compounds selected.
Send to analysis
Open the selected ligands directly in projections, clustering, histograms and the rest of the analysis workspace.
Export ligands
Download the current ligand selection in the format you need for notebooks, reports or external tools.
Save work sets
Keep chosen ligands in global sets so we can compare, merge and revisit them later.
A 0 · B 0 · C 0
Type B ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (RpiB) · T10
Leishmania infantum PDB 6FXW
Why selected: Parasite RpiB differs from the human counterpart and is an attractive antiparasitic metabolism target.
Targets
1
each capped at 50 ligands
Best-pose candidates
1372
one best pose per ligand per target
Synth metric
SA score
direct SA metric
Absolute burial proxy
n_exposed
absolute exposed hydrophobic atoms, not fraction
Pareto front 1
9
non-dominated ligands across all selected targets
Burial source
FreeSASA 0
Proxy 0 · Missing 39
Metrics coverage
Done 0
Pending 0 · Failed 0 · Missing 39
Diversity shortlist
Novelty 0.45
High novelty 39 · Close analogs 0
T10
Native Front 1: 9
39 / 1372 shortlisted
Best: ulfkktlib_1018 · score 72.0
Pareto layers observed: 13
Metrics: done 0 · pending 0 · failed 0 · missing 39
Diversity: novelty 0.45 · close analogs 0
Table view
Switch between a compact decision view, medicinal chemistry properties, and the full docking inspection layout.
Target 2D Rank Pareto Confidence Ligand Compromise Docking Final rank Inter norm n_exposed Strain dE MW cLogP TPSA SA score Safety Native sim PAINS Reactive QED SASA source Flags
T10
T10
1 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
C
Suspicious
ulfkktlib_1018
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts
recompute / inspect · The pose has meaningful reliability issues and should be treated as provisional until checked manually.
MW 183.2 · logP -0.20 · TPSA 67.2
72.0 0.82 0.9292 -1.7805 4 6.30 183.2 -0.20 67.2 2.658 0.80 0.84 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
8 protein contact clashes
T10
T10
2 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
Z45415565
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 201.2 · logP 0.73 · TPSA 69.4
63.1 0.76 1.8945 -1.7050 0 10.35 201.2 0.73 69.4 1.503 0.67 0.74 0 0 0.78 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 8 protein contact clashes
T10
T10
3 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
TC319
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 168.1 · logP 0.72 · TPSA 77.8
63.2 0.85 1.0998 -1.9696 2 16.98 168.1 0.72 77.8 1.974 0.64 0.81 0 0 0.61 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 17.0
T10
T10
4 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_3498
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 170.1 · logP -0.70 · TPSA 110.6
62.5 0.74 2.9416 -1.8542 0 15.87 170.1 -0.70 110.6 3.967 0.73 0.86 0 0 0.20 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 11 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 15.9
T10
T10
8 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
C
Suspicious
6FXW
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts
recompute / inspect · The pose has meaningful reliability issues and should be treated as provisional until checked manually.
MW 258.1 · logP -2.39 · TPSA 164.1
45.4 0.00 - - 2 - 258.1 -2.39 164.1 4.789 0.49 1.00 0 0 0.29 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Native reference ligand
T10
T10
10 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
Z371324110
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 215.3 · logP 1.12 · TPSA 69.4
61.1 0.72 2.2209 -1.5987 1 15.56 215.3 1.12 69.4 1.577 0.67 0.82 0 0 0.82 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 8 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 15.6
T10
T10
11 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
Z49940441
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 260.3 · logP 2.81 · TPSA 61.7
52.1 0.60 2.5869 -0.9992 3 14.86 260.3 2.81 61.7 2.070 0.59 0.54 0 0 0.65 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 14.9
T10
T10
12 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
Z49646854
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 407.3 · logP 4.08 · TPSA 58.5
45.2 0.50 5.3517 -1.0627 1 27.55 407.3 4.08 58.5 2.443 0.29 0.64 0 0 0.78 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 27.5
T10
T10
18 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
Z1741976376
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 179.2 · logP 0.69 · TPSA 99.2
57.2 0.71 2.5209 -1.7129 1 19.55 179.2 0.69 99.2 2.690 0.61 0.83 0 0 0.40 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 9 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 19.6
T10
T10
19 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_2311
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, clean safety profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 235.2 · logP 0.15 · TPSA 86.9
55.8 0.53 3.7940 -1.0447 1 17.23 235.2 0.15 86.9 2.453 0.76 0.77 0 0 0.66 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 11 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 17.2
T10
T10
20 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
Z31223999
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 329.5 · logP 5.03 · TPSA 37.8
47.5 0.63 2.7618 -1.0214 5 14.54 329.5 5.03 37.8 2.325 0.25 0.66 0 0 0.67 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 14.5
T10
T10
21 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
Z44831334
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 374.4 · logP 3.31 · TPSA 106.3
47.7 0.47 4.3247 -0.6923 2 18.71 374.4 3.31 106.3 2.214 0.37 0.78 0 0 0.39 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 13 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.7
T10
T10
22 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
Z56775484
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 412.5 · logP 3.67 · TPSA 96.4
40.3 0.34 6.8875 -0.7758 0 51.41 412.5 3.67 96.4 2.636 0.37 0.66 0 0 0.52 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 51.4
T10
T10
24 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0429
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 256.3 · logP -0.39 · TPSA 127.6
54.4 0.52 5.1122 -1.2564 1 38.51 256.3 -0.39 127.6 2.067 0.73 0.82 0 0 0.50 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 12 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 38.5
T10
T10
25 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z56891526
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 279.3 · logP 1.39 · TPSA 90.3
50.4 0.61 2.5444 -1.0201 6 22.10 279.3 1.39 90.3 3.061 0.64 0.64 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 3 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 22.1
T10
T10
26 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_2852
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 285.3 · logP 1.17 · TPSA 101.4
51.3 0.60 3.0927 -1.0921 8 10.92 285.3 1.17 101.4 2.650 0.61 0.77 0 0 0.75 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 8 protein contact clashes
T10
T10
27 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z19703650
reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 275.3 · logP 1.46 · TPSA 88.8
50.8 0.66 3.1668 -1.3898 10 16.87 275.3 1.46 88.8 1.864 0.64 0.63 0 0 0.81 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 16.9
T10
T10
28 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z56785135
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 272.3 · logP 2.28 · TPSA 75.3
49.9 0.56 3.9809 -1.2015 1 26.71 272.3 2.28 75.3 3.239 0.55 0.74 0 0 0.82 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 3 clashes; 11 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 26.7
T10
T10
29 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z46032353
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 284.3 · logP 3.31 · TPSA 55.8
49.3 0.45 4.8390 -0.8100 5 18.54 284.3 3.31 55.8 1.884 0.59 0.73 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.5
T10
T10
30 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z45524497
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 292.4 · logP 1.96 · TPSA 68.3
51.9 0.59 3.6032 -1.1369 6 20.60 292.4 1.96 68.3 1.771 0.55 0.78 0 0 0.88 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 8 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 20.6
T10
T10
31 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z49549408
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 278.7 · logP 2.90 · TPSA 85.1
48.4 0.63 2.4626 -1.1174 7 22.81 278.7 2.90 85.1 2.263 0.52 0.63 0 0 0.40 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 22.8
T10
T10
32 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY1027
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 306.3 · logP 0.97 · TPSA 104.3
50.3 0.43 6.4414 -1.1247 1 35.25 306.3 0.97 104.3 2.690 0.64 0.82 0 0 0.88 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 13 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 35.3
T10
T10
33 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z49547116
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 310.1 · logP 2.86 · TPSA 74.6
47.1 0.53 4.4182 -1.0602 8 7.92 310.1 2.86 74.6 2.236 0.47 0.65 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 12 protein contact clashes
T10
T10
34 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z49712358
reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 277.3 · logP 3.78 · TPSA 57.5
47.2 0.54 4.7957 -1.1341 8 24.64 277.3 3.78 57.5 2.113 0.55 0.59 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 13 clashes; 8 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 24.6
T10
T10
35 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z25218864
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 398.4 · logP 2.60 · TPSA 101.1
44.9 0.54 5.7068 -1.0462 14 27.25 398.4 2.60 101.1 2.478 0.41 0.88 0 0 0.64 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 12 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 27.3
T10
T10
36 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_Leishmania_259
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 286.3 · logP 3.07 · TPSA 91.5
43.4 0.64 3.1438 -1.2567 9 17.48 286.3 3.07 91.5 2.515 0.27 0.79 0 0 0.65 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 7 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 17.5
T10
T10
37 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z46033738
reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 292.3 · logP 3.93 · TPSA 57.5
41.1 0.55 2.7692 -0.7901 13 8.98 292.3 3.93 57.5 2.282 0.59 0.27 0 0 0.82 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes
T10
T10
38 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
MK6
100% of hydrophobic surface is solvent-exposed (21/21 atoms). Large non-polar area without protein contacts incurs a desolvation penalty and will reduce binding affinity. Consider truncating or replacing the exposed fragment.
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 340.4 · logP 4.49 · TPSA 58.9
34.1 0.56 2.9876 -0.8010 21 12.60 340.4 4.49 58.9 3.367 0.51 0.29 0 0 0.75 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 12.6
T10
T10
39 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z56792679
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 283.3 · logP 2.99 · TPSA 79.9
49.8 0.56 3.4725 -1.0031 8 15.06 283.3 2.99 79.9 2.289 0.52 0.85 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 8 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 15.1
T10
T10
40 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z18922445
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 288.3 · logP 2.95 · TPSA 44.8
48.9 0.53 4.4470 -1.0766 8 11.96 288.3 2.95 44.8 1.857 0.59 0.66 0 0 0.81 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes
T10
T10
41 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z381095742
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 263.3 · logP 1.91 · TPSA 69.4
52.4 0.58 3.7773 -1.2257 7 19.85 263.3 1.91 69.4 1.456 0.59 0.83 0 0 0.92 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 9 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 19.8
T10
T10
42 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z49615969
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 282.3 · logP 3.28 · TPSA 61.7
48.8 0.59 3.6420 -1.2287 11 18.21 282.3 3.28 61.7 1.832 0.59 0.81 0 0 0.67 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 9 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.2
T10
T10
43 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TbNat_2
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 340.4 · logP 3.91 · TPSA 98.0
44.9 0.55 3.9470 -0.9828 13 14.98 340.4 3.91 98.0 2.661 0.52 0.76 0 0 0.38 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 15.0
T10
T10
44 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z56932065
well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 376.5 · logP 1.67 · TPSA 92.0
46.4 0.61 2.7968 -1.0296 7 33.49 376.5 1.67 92.0 3.622 0.55 0.63 0 0 0.41 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 4 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 33.5
T10
T10
45 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z49615787
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 276.2 · logP 1.55 · TPSA 115.1
46.9 0.51 5.6907 -1.3518 6 52.55 276.2 1.55 115.1 2.599 0.61 0.82 0 0 0.58 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 52.5
T10
T10
46 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z49907521
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 325.4 · logP 3.81 · TPSA 62.5
44.3 0.59 3.1805 -1.0224 10 30.27 325.4 3.81 62.5 2.497 0.44 0.69 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 30.3
T10
T10
47 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TbNat_137
native-like contacts
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 374.4 · logP 1.99 · TPSA 102.3
42.4 0.51 4.5557 -0.9098 14 13.49 374.4 1.99 102.3 4.146 0.55 0.73 0 0 0.61 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 10 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 13.5
T10
T10
49 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z49638306
native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 398.4 · logP 3.86 · TPSA 107.7
39.2 0.30 7.3664 -0.6298 9 15.33 398.4 3.86 107.7 2.354 0.41 0.73 0 0 0.36 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 16 clashes; 15 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 15.3
T10
T10
50 6
Front 6
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_491
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 285.3 · logP 0.89 · TPSA 94.2
49.6 0.48 5.9010 -1.2052 7 21.08 285.3 0.89 94.2 2.014 0.64 0.84 0 0 0.87 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 9 clashes; 15 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 21.1
How to build the score
Docking 28% · final rank, interaction-normalized score, raw docking score
Burial 18% · absolute exposed hydrophobic atom count (lower is better)
Strain 14% · strain delta, intra score, geometry sanity
Safety / EcoTox 18% · ADMET plus ecotox, reweighted toward cleaner liabilities
Synthesis 10% · SA score when available, otherwise Fsp3 proxy
Native similarity 12% · contact and H-bond recall when a native reference exists
Diversity shortlist 0% · cached shortlist already includes the novelty-aware selection step

How ranking works: first we build Pareto fronts from docking, burial, strain, safety/ecotox, synthesizability, and native-like interactions. Front 1 contains non-dominated ligands, meaning no other ligand is better in all tracked objectives at once. Inside each front, ligands are ordered by a compromise score, which is a weighted desirability score with explicit penalties for PAINS, reactivity, toxicity alerts, geometry warnings, excluded poses, and artifact annotations. The top 50 per target are then taken front-by-front; if the cut falls inside one front, the compromise score decides the boundary.

Methodology
1. Candidate definition. For each target we keep one best pose per ligand, so the shortlist is not inflated by many similar poses of the same compound.
2. Objective set. Each ligand is evaluated across docking quality, absolute nonpolar solvent exposure (`n_exposed`), conformational strain, native-like interaction similarity when a native reference exists, safety and ecotoxicology, synthesizability, and general developability indicators such as QED.
2a. SASA / burial source. The new `SASA source` column tells you whether burial-sensitive surface metrics were computed from `FreeSASA` (`FreeSASA`), approximated only from the contact-based exposure proxy because no surface calculation was possible (`Proxy only`), or expected but still unavailable (`Not available`). Pareto ranking still uses the absolute `n_exposed` burial proxy everywhere, but `FreeSASA` gives extra physical context for how trustworthy the burial picture is.
3. Liability penalties. PAINS motifs, reactive groups, toxicity alerts, artifact annotations, geometry warnings, and excluded-pose flags do not automatically remove a ligand, but they reduce its compromise score and are exposed explicitly in the table.
4. Pareto ranking. A ligand is placed on Pareto front 1 when no other ligand for the same target is better across all tracked objectives at once. Lower front number means a more balanced profile, not just a stronger docking score.
5. Confidence / reliability. `A` means the ligand is internally consistent across docking, geometry, liabilities, and SASA availability. `B` means promising but still worth inspection. `C` flags provisional hits with clashes, moderate strain, or missing SASA. `D` is reserved for clear artefacts or chemically unreliable poses that should not be trusted without rescue evidence.
6. Compromise score. Inside each Pareto front we apply a weighted desirability score to prioritize practical ligands. The current formula is `100 x clamp(weighted positive score - liability penalty - missing-data penalty)`, where the weighted positive score uses docking `28%`, burial `18%`, strain `14%`, safety/ecotox `18%`, synthesis `10%`, and native similarity `12%` when a native reference exists.
7. Component details. The docking component itself is a weighted mix of `final_rank_score` `55%`, `score_inter_norm` `30%`, and raw docking `score` `15%`. Strain combines `strain_delta` `55%`, `score_intra_norm` `30%`, and geometry sanity `15%`. Liability penalties are then added for PAINS, reactivity, toxicity alerts, excluded poses, artifact flags, and failed geometry checks.
8. SA score / SA column. This column shows the raw synthesis-related metric stored for the ligand. When a direct SA score is available, it is preferred; otherwise a proxy fallback is used. The table shows that raw value for transparency, but ranking uses the normalized `synth_component`, so the compromise score always interprets a better synthesis profile as a higher contribution.
9. Final shortlist. The top 50 ligands per target are taken front-by-front. If the cutoff falls inside one front, the compromise score determines which ligands stay in the visible shortlist.
10. Diversity-aware selection. The visible top 50 is not a simple first-50 truncation. After Pareto and compromise scoring we run a novelty-aware selection step that favours ligands which add scaffold or fingerprint diversity, so near-duplicate analogs do not dominate the shortlist.
How to read the table. `Pareto` shows the non-dominated layer, `Compromise` is the within-front ordering score, `n_exposed` is an absolute burial proxy where lower is better, `Strain dE` captures conformational stress, and the colored dots provide a quick green/orange/red cue for each property.
How to use selections. You can mark compounds row-by-row, save them into `Current`, `Temp`, or global sets `A/B/C`, export them to `SDF`, `XLSX`, or `CSV`, and send the selected subset straight into downstream analysis pages for histograms, projections, and other exploratory views.