FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 9 best compound-target hits listed 9 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T03T07T08T10T12T14T16T21T22
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
0.932 0.845 9 0.81 0.85 0.82 0.88 0.93 0.75 0.80 0.92 0.83

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.932 1.000 0.806 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.6473 -0.794752 18 11 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.921 1.000 0.773 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.899 -0.794939 18 12 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.881 1.000 0.660 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.203 -0.707003 16 10 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.850 1.000 0.571 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.0109 -0.920357 17 11 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.835 1.000 0.528 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.8781 -0.883666 18 9 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.824 1.000 0.498 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.1727 -0.923712 16 9 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.811 1.000 0.460 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.6339 -0.757765 11 3 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.799 1.000 0.425 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.8611 -0.697603 15 7 Pose
TC227
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=N/N([H])c2nc3c(c(=O)n(C)c(=O)n3C)n2C[C@H](COc2ccccc2)O[H])c(O)c1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.753 1.000 0.293 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.2653 -0.658299 13 7 Pose