FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
6 compounds in matrix 13 best compound-target hits listed 12 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T09T11T14T15T18T19T20T21T22
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
0.918 0.823 4 0.92 0.84 0.72 0.82
OHD_TbNat_162
[H]Oc1ccc([C@H]2OC[C@H]3[C@@H]2CO[C@@H]3c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)cc1O[H]
0.901 0.901 1 0.90
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2C[N+]1([H])[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
0.871 0.836 3 0.82 0.87 0.81
OHD_TbNat_161
[H]N(C[C@@H]1CCCO1)C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H]
0.855 0.814 2 0.77 0.86
OHD_TbNat_16
[H]Oc1c(C[C@](C)(CC(=O)O)O[H])ccc2c1C(=O)c1cccc(O[C@@H]3O[C@@H](C)[C@H](O[H])[C@@H](O[H])[C@H]3O[H])c1C2=O
0.840 0.827 2 0.81 0.84
OHD_TbNat_162
[H]Oc1ccc([C@H]2OC[C@@H]3[C@H]2CO[C@@H]3c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)cc1O[H]
0.786 0.786 1 0.79

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.918 1.000 0.766 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0587 -0.70765 13 6 Pose
OHD_TbNat_162
[H]Oc1ccc([C@H]2OC[C@H]3[C@@H]2CO[C@@H]3c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)cc1O[H]
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.901 1.000 0.716 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.5695 -1.01274 13 8 Pose
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2C[N+]1([H])[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.871 1.000 0.630 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.2221 -0.752092 20 4 Pose
OHD_TbNat_161
[H]N(C[C@@H]1CCCO1)C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H]
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.855 1.000 0.586 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.6863 -1.04896 25 11 Pose
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.840 1.000 0.544 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.6168 -0.750026 17 2 Pose
OHD_TbNat_16
[H]Oc1c(C[C@](C)(CC(=O)O)O[H])ccc2c1C(=O)c1cccc(O[C@@H]3O[C@@H](C)[C@H](O[H])[C@@H](O[H])[C@H]3O[H])c1C2=O
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.840 1.000 0.542 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.7472 -0.672281 9 8 Pose
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2C[N+]1([H])[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.823 1.000 0.495 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.6823 -0.759578 19 1 Pose
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.817 1.000 0.478 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.3518 -0.631583 12 4 Pose
OHD_TbNat_16
[H]Oc1c(C[C@](C)(CC(=O)O)O[H])ccc2c1C(=O)c1cccc(O[C@@H]3O[C@@H](C)[C@H](O[H])[C@@H](O[H])[C@H]3O[H])c1C2=O
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.815 1.000 0.471 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.9078 -0.725323 15 7 Pose
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2C[N+]1([H])[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.813 1.000 0.465 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.5126 -0.772851 20 1 Pose
OHD_TbNat_162
[H]Oc1ccc([C@H]2OC[C@@H]3[C@H]2CO[C@@H]3c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)cc1O[H]
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.786 1.000 0.388 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.699 -1.02417 12 6 Pose
OHD_TbNat_161
[H]N(C[C@@H]1CCCO1)C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H]
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.774 1.000 0.353 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.1753 -0.634348 14 6 Pose
OHD_TbNat_160
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H]1Cc2ccccc2CN1[H])c1cc(C)cc(C)c1
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.716 1.000 0.188 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.4501 -0.913496 23 6 Pose