FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 17 best compound-target hits listed 17 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T04T05T08T09T10T11T12T14T15T17T19T20T21T22
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
0.948 0.844 13 0.86 0.82 0.78 0.88 0.80 0.74 0.95 0.89 0.81 0.84 0.80 0.90 0.90
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2c3ncn([H])/c(=N\[N+]([H])=C\c4cc(O[H])c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)c3nc[n+]2[H])cc1
0.896 0.833 4 0.86 0.90 0.76 0.82

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.948 1.000 0.851 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.6889 -0.834522 18 15 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.904 1.000 0.725 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.3461 -0.916306 19 16 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.899 1.000 0.712 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.2046 -0.929491 25 16 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2c3ncn([H])/c(=N\[N+]([H])=C\c4cc(O[H])c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)c3nc[n+]2[H])cc1
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.896 1.000 0.704 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.2713 -0.91117 16 12 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.891 1.000 0.688 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.574 -0.72972 13 11 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.879 1.000 0.653 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.0906 -0.747066 15 9 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.862 1.000 0.605 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.736 -0.851204 22 8 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2c3ncn([H])/c(=N\[N+]([H])=C\c4cc(O[H])c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)c3nc[n+]2[H])cc1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.856 1.000 0.589 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.6515 -0.986296 22 14 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.840 1.000 0.544 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.8914 -0.846288 17 8 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2c3ncn([H])/c(=N\[N+]([H])=C\c4cc(O[H])c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)c3nc[n+]2[H])cc1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.824 1.000 0.496 native_similarity final_rank_score -14.1675 -0.558384 11 6 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.823 1.000 0.493 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.2635 -0.868392 17 8 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.811 1.000 0.460 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.9977 -0.671838 12 8 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.798 1.000 0.422 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.1583 -0.974924 18 3 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.797 1.000 0.419 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.0817 -0.961514 12 15 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.780 1.000 0.370 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.4456 -0.842641 15 8 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2c3ncn([H])/c(=N\[N+]([H])=C\c4cc(O[H])c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)c3nc[n+]2[H])cc1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.756 1.000 0.302 native_similarity final_rank_score -15.8775 -0.726403 17 11 Pose
OHD_MAC_51
[H]OCCCOc1ccc(N([H])c2ncnc3c(N([H])/N=C/c4cc(O)c(O[H])c(O[H])c4)ncnc23)cc1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.743 1.000 0.267 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.7113 -0.798666 14 4 Pose