FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T04T05T07T08T12
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])[n+]([H])c2ncc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)nc12
0.941 0.930 3 0.92 0.94 0.92
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])c2nc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)cnc2n1
0.922 0.874 5 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.92

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])[n+]([H])c2ncc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)nc12
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.941 1.000 0.832 native_similarity final_rank_score -40.4499 -1.05532 19 7 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])[n+]([H])c2ncc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)nc12
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.925 1.000 0.785 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.5704 -0.69453 21 11 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])[n+]([H])c2ncc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)nc12
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.924 1.000 0.784 native_similarity final_rank_score -38.7032 -0.969977 19 9 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])c2nc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)cnc2n1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.922 1.000 0.778 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.44 -0.722747 18 6 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])c2nc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)cnc2n1
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.909 1.000 0.741 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.6976 -0.846386 15 5 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])c2nc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)cnc2n1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.862 1.000 0.605 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.1565 -0.688344 22 3 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])c2nc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)cnc2n1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.855 1.000 0.587 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.7615 -0.75388 22 11 Pose
OHD_Leishmania_125
[H]N([H])c1nc(N([H])[H])c2nc(CN(Cc3ccccc3)c3ccc(C(=O)N4CCC(C(=O)OC)CC4)cc3)cnc2n1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.821 1.000 0.489 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.9528 -0.6621 22 5 Pose