FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 11 best compound-target hits listed 11 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T06T08T10T11T12T16T17T18
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
0.925 0.834 11 0.77 0.80 0.86 0.91 0.88 0.86 0.75 0.93 0.85 0.78 0.79

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.925 1.000 0.787 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.9587 -1.09518 19 10 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.913 1.000 0.752 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.4231 -0.871094 21 9 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.880 1.000 0.656 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.3874 -1.13622 14 8 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.858 1.000 0.594 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.1411 -0.818782 15 11 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.857 1.000 0.591 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.1237 -0.919501 18 4 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.849 1.000 0.568 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.2965 -0.778884 14 7 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.798 1.000 0.423 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.9011 -0.955566 16 5 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.789 1.000 0.397 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.385 -0.695293 15 7 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.784 1.000 0.382 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.972 -0.791884 20 11 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.769 1.000 0.341 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.2983 -0.898773 18 11 Pose
NMT-TY0950
[H]N([H])c1c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.749 1.000 0.283 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.4665 -0.791328 18 8 Pose