FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
4 compounds in matrix 10 best compound-target hits listed 10 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T09T12T14T16T17T20T21
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
0.871 0.797 4 0.78 0.87 0.77 0.77
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@@](C)(C(=O)N1CCN(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
0.867 0.867 1 0.87
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(O[H])c3=O)CC1)O2
0.855 0.825 3 0.86 0.84 0.78
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CCN(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
0.848 0.825 2 0.80 0.85

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.871 1.000 0.633 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.9458 -0.849124 18 6 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@@](C)(C(=O)N1CCN(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.867 1.000 0.619 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.5013 -0.671887 21 5 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(O[H])c3=O)CC1)O2
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.855 1.000 0.586 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.692 -0.772941 20 4 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CCN(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.848 1.000 0.567 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.9361 -0.81948 20 5 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(O[H])c3=O)CC1)O2
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.836 1.000 0.532 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.3336 -0.708682 20 4 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CCN(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.802 1.000 0.433 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.077 -0.793093 17 3 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(O[H])c3=O)CC1)O2
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.785 1.000 0.385 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.8415 -0.554716 13 6 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.777 1.000 0.364 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.5902 -0.741356 18 5 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.771 1.000 0.345 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.0434 -0.637183 18 5 Pose
MK61
[H]Oc1c(C)c(C)c2c(c1C)CC[C@](C)(C(=O)N1CC[N+]([H])(Cc3ccc(C(C)C)cc(=O)c3O[H])CC1)O2
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.766 1.000 0.332 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.975 -0.617111 14 7 Pose