FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
6 compounds in matrix 15 best compound-target hits listed 15 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T08T09T13T14T15T16T17T18T19T20T21T22
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
0.909 0.840 5 0.86 0.81 0.91 0.77 0.85
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
0.886 0.826 3 0.86 0.73 0.89
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@@H]1C
0.873 0.835 3 0.82 0.81 0.87
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cnc2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@H]1C
0.843 0.816 2 0.84 0.79
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@@H]1C
0.809 0.809 1 0.81
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@H]1C
0.791 0.791 1 0.79

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.909 1.000 0.740 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.6774 -0.721886 19 5 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.886 1.000 0.675 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.7114 -0.62692 14 5 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@@H]1C
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.873 1.000 0.637 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.8669 -0.730726 17 7 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.862 1.000 0.605 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.9633 -0.830144 17 3 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T13
native IFP available
T13
selection_import_t13
0.858 1.000 0.594 native_similarity final_rank_score -33.0429 -0.962786 22 9 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.851 1.000 0.575 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.5441 -0.938024 23 9 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cnc2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@H]1C
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.843 1.000 0.551 native_similarity final_rank_score -34.0856 -1.04789 17 4 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@@H]1C
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.820 1.000 0.487 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.2148 -0.859196 16 4 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@@H]1C
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.813 1.000 0.466 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.882 -0.773922 14 4 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.810 1.000 0.458 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.828 -0.72695 11 7 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@@H]1C
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.809 1.000 0.454 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.5621 -0.7968 19 4 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@H]1C
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.791 1.000 0.402 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.9915 -0.814986 16 1 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cnc2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1O)[C@H]1CCC[C@@H](C)[C@H]1C
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.790 1.000 0.400 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0752 -0.701326 12 5 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.766 1.000 0.330 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.8302 -0.657716 17 5 Pose
KB_HAT_92
[H]N(C(=O)c1cn([H])c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c3ccccc3C)cc2c1=O)[C@@H]1CCC[C@H](C)[C@H]1C
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.734 1.000 0.240 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.517 -0.996843 18 8 Pose