FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
5 compounds in matrix 7 best compound-target hits listed 5 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T02T15T16T18T22
OSA_Lib_38
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]([C@H](OC(=O)c4ccncc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCC1
0.845 0.845 1 0.84
OSA_Lib_384
[H]O[C@H]1C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCOCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.835 0.809 2 0.84 0.78
OSA_Lib_38
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@@H](OC(=O)c4ccncc4)[C@H]([C@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCC1
0.819 0.819 1 0.82
OSA_Lib_382
[H]O[C@H]1C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.818 0.800 2 0.82 0.78
OSA_Lib_38
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]([C@@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](OC(=O)c2ccncc2)C3)CCCC1
0.793 0.793 1 0.79

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_38
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]([C@H](OC(=O)c4ccncc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCC1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.845 1.000 0.557 native_similarity final_rank_score -13.0263 -0.754798 21 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_384
[H]O[C@H]1C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCOCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.835 1.000 0.529 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.5493 -0.882413 14 5 Pose
OSA_Lib_38
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@@H](OC(=O)c4ccncc4)[C@H]([C@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCC1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.819 1.000 0.484 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.2277 -1.01665 22 7 Pose
OSA_Lib_382
[H]O[C@H]1C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.818 1.000 0.481 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.9028 -0.888329 13 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_38
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]([C@@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](OC(=O)c2ccncc2)C3)CCCC1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.793 1.000 0.408 native_similarity final_rank_score -15.2131 -0.635428 14 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_382
[H]O[C@H]1C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.782 1.000 0.378 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.2099 -0.865006 14 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_384
[H]O[C@H]1C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCOCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.782 1.000 0.378 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.6255 -0.89884 14 5 Pose