FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
8 compounds in matrix 10 best compound-target hits listed 10 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T10T12T15T16T17T18T21
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.941 0.941 1 0.94
OSA_Lib_81
[H]OC1CCN(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.894 0.894 1 0.89
OSA_Lib_81
[H]OC1CCN(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.894 0.894 1 0.89
OSA_Lib_81
[H]OC1CCN(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.890 0.890 1 0.89
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.850 0.818 2 0.85 0.79
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.835 0.835 1 0.84
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.820 0.820 1 0.82
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
0.789 0.772 2 0.79 0.76

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.941 1.000 0.832 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0298 -0.835326 18 8 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]OC1CCN(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.894 1.000 0.698 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.3258 -0.774733 19 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]OC1CCN(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.894 1.000 0.697 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.2281 -0.705079 16 8 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]OC1CCN(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.890 1.000 0.685 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.4668 -0.737886 17 5 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.850 1.000 0.570 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.2419 -0.713031 20 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.835 1.000 0.530 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.5626 -0.646048 18 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.820 1.000 0.485 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.2528 -0.672378 20 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.789 1.000 0.396 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.977 -0.719505 18 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.786 1.000 0.389 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.2626 -0.599605 19 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_81
[H]O[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(CCC(=O)O[C@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CC1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.756 1.000 0.302 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.517 -0.540884 14 3 Pose