FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 9 best compound-target hits listed 9 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T07T08T09T15T17T19T20
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCCN3CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
0.946 0.839 5 0.82 0.90 0.81 0.72 0.95
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
0.847 0.815 4 0.83 0.85 0.81 0.77

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCCN3CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.946 1.000 0.846 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.4804 -0.656087 13 5 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCCN3CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.898 1.000 0.709 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.1093 -1.01266 16 3 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.847 1.000 0.563 native_similarity final_rank_score -33.079 -1.17685 17 2 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.834 1.000 0.524 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.7118 -0.861542 18 6 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCCN3CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.823 1.000 0.493 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.3609 -0.863046 17 5 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.812 1.000 0.464 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.14 -0.899163 18 3 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCCN3CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.811 1.000 0.461 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.6395 -0.79323 17 3 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.768 1.000 0.337 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.095 -0.793444 16 3 Pose
OHD_TB2019_3
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCCN3CC[N+]([H])([H])CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.717 1.000 0.192 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.7784 -1.06707 19 8 Pose