FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
3 compounds in matrix 7 best compound-target hits listed 7 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T05T08T09T11T16
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
0.900 0.861 2 0.82 0.90
KB_Leish_181
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
0.869 0.819 2 0.87 0.77
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
0.798 0.794 3 0.79 0.79 0.80

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.900 1.000 0.714 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.7811 -0.840424 14 4 Pose
KB_Leish_181
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.869 1.000 0.624 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.7706 -0.850647 14 4 Pose
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)[C@H]1CC[N@+]([H])(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.823 1.000 0.493 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.064 -0.851208 17 4 Pose
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.798 1.000 0.424 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.2875 -0.80017 18 3 Pose
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.794 1.000 0.412 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.3888 -0.939806 14 4 Pose
KB_Leish_181
[H][N+]([H])(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.790 1.000 0.400 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.0626 -0.806671 14 4 Pose
KB_Leish_181
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2cccs2)cc1)C1CCN(CCn2c(=O)cnc3ccc(OC)nc32)CC1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.769 1.000 0.339 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.9468 -0.719235 19 4 Pose