FAIRMol

OHD_ACDS_72

Pose ID 8124 Compound 3327 Pose 672

DB fairmolDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T12
T. brucei R5P T. brucei
Ligand OHD_ACDS_72
PDB6FXS

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Reject SASA cached
Promising but geometrically suspicious
Binding strong Geometry low Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
49.7 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
3
Internal clashes
3
Native overlap
contact recall 0.75, Jaccard 0.57, H-bond role recall 0.40
Burial
65%
Hydrophobic fit
76%
Reason: strain 49.7 kcal/mol
strain ΔE 49.7 kcal/mol 3 protein-contact clashes 3 intramolecular clashes 57% of hydrophobic surface appears solvent-exposed (12/21 atoms). Partial exposure is common but may limit selectivity and membrane permeability.
EcoTox / ADMET In-silico prediction only
Fish LC₅₀
Cat. 3 — Harmful (10–100 mg/L)
Daphnia EC₅₀
Cat. 3 — Harmful (10–100 mg/L)
Algae IC₅₀
Cat. 3 — Harmful (10–100 mg/L)
Bioaccum.
Not B (BCF≤2000)
Persistent
No
ADMET alerts (in-silico)
hERG Medium Ames Clear DILI Low
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Reject Multiple quality flags — this pose should be deprioritised or discarded.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.667 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -6.50) ✓ Strong H-bond network (7 bonds) ✓ Deep burial (65% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (76%) ✗ Extreme strain energy (49.7 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (10)
Score
-20.687
kcal/mol
LE
-0.667
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-6.50
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
31
heavy atoms
MW
442
Da
LogP
2.77
cLogP
Final rank
4.7260
rank score
Inter norm
-0.913
normalised
Contacts
17
H-bonds 11
Strain ΔE
49.7 kcal/mol
SASA buried
65%
Lipo contact
76% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
728 Ų
Apolar buried
360 Ų

Interaction summary

HBD 1 HBA 6 HY 3 PI 3 CLASH 3

HBD/HBA · H-bonds (geometric)

HBD = ligand donates H · HBA = ligand accepts H · ~ = weak (≥110°). Mode: strict. Residues: 3.

PI · π–π interactions

Native π–π recall is disabled because no explicit native π–π reference was stored.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: strict.
Name6FXSContacts16
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ARG140 ARG144 ASN106 HIS105 HIS141 ARG46 ASP13 CYS72 GLY73 GLY75 GLY77 HIS14 ILE15 ILE76 SER74 TYR49
Current overlap12Native recall0.75
Jaccard0.57RMSD-
HB strict6Strict recall0.50
HB same residue+role4HB role recall0.40
HB same residue4HB residue recall0.40

Protein summary

302 residues
Protein targetT12Atoms4598
Residues302Chains2
Residue summaryARG:576; ILE:456; VAL:448; GLU:360; ALA:340; LEU:304; TYR:252; HIS:204; PRO:196; THR:196; GLY:182; LYS:176; ASP:168; PHE:160; MET:153; SER:121

Receptor context

1 kept / 0 excluded
Receptor context filtering: interactions and SASA are computed against protein atoms plus allowed cofactors/ions. Native ligand-like HETATM partners are excluded from scoring.
Kept context 1 Excluded HETATM 0
Kept cofactors / ions
A:CSD72

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
676 3.107132603492463 -0.865721 -22.9001 10 18 0 0.00 0.00 - no Open
674 3.500532729706216 -0.828669 -17.0178 6 18 0 0.00 0.00 - no Open
672 4.725967318510728 -0.913373 -20.6868 11 17 12 0.75 0.40 - no Current

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -20.687kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.6673kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -6.501
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 31HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 441.9Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 2.77
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 9

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 49.66kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 85.19kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy 35.54kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 728.2Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 475.3Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 359.7Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 115.6Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 65.3%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 75.7%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -2225.2Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 2454.8Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 806.2Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)