FAIRMol

OHD_MAC_13

Pose ID 6396 Compound 3056 Pose 300

DB SELECTIONDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T10
L. infantum R5P L. infantum
Ligand OHD_MAC_13

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Weak SASA cached
Weak or marginal quality
Binding strong Geometry medium Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
38.2 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
3
Internal clashes
3
Native overlap
contact recall 0.82, Jaccard 0.74, H-bond role recall 0.36
Burial
60%
Hydrophobic fit
84%
Reason: no major geometry red flags detected
3 protein-contact clashes 3 intramolecular clashes 71% of hydrophobic surface is solvent-exposed (15/21 atoms). Large non-polar area without protein contacts incurs a desolvation penalty and will reduce binding affinity. Consider truncating or replacing the exposed fragment.
EcoTox / ADMET GDS: UNSAFE UL GreenDrugScore ML model
ECOscore
0.282
aquatic tox · BCF · biodeg.
GDS₃ (3-block)
0.359
ADMET + ECO + DL
ADMETscore (GDS)
0.359
absorption · distr. · metab.
DLscore
0.405
drug-likeness
P(SAFE)
0.12
GDS classification
ADMET alerts (in-silico)
hERG Medium Ames Clear DILI Low
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Weak Marginal quality. Consider only alongside better-scoring alternatives.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.478 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -4.66) ✓ Strong H-bond network (9 bonds) ✓ Good burial (60% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (84%) ✗ Very high strain energy (38.2 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (15)
Score
-14.825
kcal/mol
LE
-0.478
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-4.66
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
31
heavy atoms
MW
436
Da
LogP
3.63
cLogP
Final rank
4.6785
rank score
Inter norm
-0.805
normalised
Contacts
16
H-bonds 10
Strain ΔE
38.2 kcal/mol
SASA buried
60%
Lipo contact
84% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
722 Ų
Apolar buried
368 Ų

Interaction summary

HBD 1 HBA 8 HY 2 PI 1 CLASH 3

HBD/HBA · H-bonds (geometric)

HBD = ligand donates H · HBA = ligand accepts H · ~ = weak (≥110°). Mode: strict. Residues: 5.

PI · π–π interactions

Native π–π recall is disabled because no explicit native π–π reference was stored.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: strict.
Name6FXWContacts17
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ALA15 ARG116 ARG140 ARG144 ASN106 ASP13 CYS72 GLY73 GLY75 GLY77 HIS105 HIS14 HIS141 ILE76 LEU101 THR74 TYR49
Current overlap14Native recall0.82
Jaccard0.74RMSD-
HB strict5Strict recall0.38
HB same residue+role4HB role recall0.36
HB same residue4HB residue recall0.36

Protein summary

155 residues
Protein targetT10Atoms4590
Residues155Chains1
Residue summaryILE:494; ARG:384; ALA:360; VAL:352; LEU:304; GLU:300; THR:280; MET:272; LYS:220; ASP:216; TYR:210; HIS:204; GLY:182; SER:176; GLN:170; ASN:140

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
301 1.0181100120224715 -1.0331 -20.505 8 22 0 0.00 0.00 - no Open
332 1.1403532490099655 -1.03239 -30.952 9 18 0 0.00 0.00 - no Open
321 3.114735788832455 -0.89519 -20.8179 11 16 5 0.29 0.27 - no Open
300 4.678482923542277 -0.805388 -14.8254 10 16 14 0.82 0.36 - no Current

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -14.825kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.4782kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -4.659
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 31HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 435.9Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 3.63
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 9

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 38.19kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 115.66kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy 77.47kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 722.1Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 437.2Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 368.1Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 69.1Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 60.5%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 84.2%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -2325.9Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 2417.4Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 706.0Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)