FAIRMol

Ligand prioritization

Interactive top-50 shortlist per target built from a transparent multi-objective workflow. It combines docking quality, absolute exposed hydrophobic atoms, low strain, safety/ecotox, synthesizability, and native-contact similarity when a native reference exists, then uses Pareto fronts plus a compromise score to expose the most balanced ligands.

DB Docking_panel_21
50 shortlisted rows 1 targets
Priority cache is ready
Stran zdaj bere že shranjene rezultate iz baze, zato je odzivna. Rebuild v ozadju uporabi, ko želiš osvežiti Pareto-kompromisni izbor za trenutno filtriran nabor.
Selection workspace
No compounds selected.
Send to analysis
Open the selected ligands directly in projections, clustering, histograms and the rest of the analysis workspace.
Export ligands
Download the current ligand selection in the format you need for notebooks, reports or external tools.
Save work sets
Keep chosen ligands in global sets so we can compare, merge and revisit them later.
A 0 · B 0 · C 0
Bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFR-TS) · T09
likely Leishmania major / Leishmania sp. homology model PDB 3CL9-template
Why selected: Classic antiparasitic folate-pathway target for Leishmania/Trypanosoma programs.
Targets
1
each capped at 50 ligands
Best-pose candidates
1030
one best pose per ligand per target
Synth metric
SA score
direct SA metric
Absolute burial proxy
n_exposed
absolute exposed hydrophobic atoms, not fraction
Pareto front 1
7
non-dominated ligands across all selected targets
Burial source
FreeSASA 0
Proxy 0 · Missing 50
Metrics coverage
Done 0
Pending 0 · Failed 0 · Missing 50
Diversity shortlist
Novelty 0.45
High novelty 50 · Close analogs 0
T09
Native Front 1: 7
50 / 1030 shortlisted
Best: NMT-TY0169 · score 63.2
Pareto layers observed: 19
Metrics: done 0 · pending 0 · failed 0 · missing 50
Diversity: novelty 0.45 · close analogs 0
Table view
Switch between a compact decision view, medicinal chemistry properties, and the full docking inspection layout.
Target 2D Rank Pareto Confidence Ligand Compromise Docking Final rank Inter norm n_exposed Strain dE MW cLogP TPSA SA score Safety Native sim PAINS Reactive QED SASA source Flags
T09
T09
1 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0169
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 248.3 · logP 1.12 · TPSA 89.8
63.2 0.86 1.4971 -1.6001 0 7.52 248.3 1.12 89.8 2.326 0.64 0.56 0 0 0.69 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
2 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
Z1259157949
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 221.7 · logP 2.44 · TPSA 43.4
62.7 0.92 0.6181 -1.6776 0 6.44 221.7 2.44 43.4 3.431 0.59 0.58 0 0 0.69 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 5 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
3 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
Z1431039903
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 251.3 · logP 2.24 · TPSA 65.1
59.4 0.80 2.0412 -1.4830 0 6.58 251.3 2.24 65.1 2.896 0.55 0.55 0 0 0.75 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
4 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
Z57281539
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 300.7 · logP 4.12 · TPSA 69.1
55.0 0.71 1.3099 -1.0845 0 9.98 300.7 4.12 69.1 2.330 0.44 0.49 0 0 0.67 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
5 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_983
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 297.3 · logP 4.45 · TPSA 51.1
53.4 0.66 2.4057 -1.1337 0 4.64 297.3 4.45 51.1 3.134 0.48 0.48 0 0 0.55 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
6 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
Z46033738
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 292.3 · logP 3.93 · TPSA 57.5
50.5 0.49 2.4577 -0.7656 0 7.26 292.3 3.93 57.5 2.282 0.59 0.38 0 0 0.82 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
7 1
Front 1 (non-dominated)
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_976
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 302.4 · logP 5.36 · TPSA 14.1
50.2 0.71 1.5557 -1.1506 0 4.82 302.4 5.36 14.1 2.970 0.21 0.48 0 0 0.47 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
8 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
TC287
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, clean safety profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 235.3 · logP -0.33 · TPSA 98.8
61.4 0.86 1.4476 -1.6535 0 18.43 235.3 -0.33 98.8 3.110 0.76 0.53 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 3 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.4
T09
T09
9 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
Z49907469
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 280.4 · logP 3.49 · TPSA 46.0
54.9 0.62 2.1289 -1.0231 0 12.18 280.4 3.49 46.0 2.542 0.55 0.54 0 0 0.59 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 12.2
T09
T09
10 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TB2022_44
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 334.2 · logP 3.71 · TPSA 89.8
55.2 0.71 2.3063 -1.2461 1 9.04 334.2 3.71 89.8 2.137 0.41 0.75 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
11 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_912
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 227.2 · logP 1.50 · TPSA 78.3
53.1 0.79 1.9134 -1.5267 0 16.74 227.2 1.50 78.3 2.423 0.49 0.39 0 0 0.67 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 9 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 16.7
T09
T09
12 2
Front 2
D
Reject / artefact
Z1431036083
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 285.8 · logP 2.90 · TPSA 65.1
57.3 0.72 3.0122 -1.4360 0 7.17 285.8 2.90 65.1 2.941 0.55 0.58 0 0 0.78 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 7 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
13 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_3115
strong docking, well-buried hydrophobics, clean safety profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 232.3 · logP -0.99 · TPSA 107.7
57.1 0.76 2.4149 -1.5173 0 37.42 232.3 -0.99 107.7 3.425 0.81 0.58 0 0 0.31 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 37.4
T09
T09
14 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0566
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 280.3 · logP 0.02 · TPSA 150.0
56.4 0.70 2.5100 -1.3517 0 18.83 280.3 0.02 150.0 2.318 0.57 0.75 0 0 0.58 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.8
T09
T09
15 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_ACDS_25
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 345.3 · logP 4.33 · TPSA 59.2
54.1 0.68 1.6183 -1.0761 0 5.46 345.3 4.33 59.2 2.872 0.44 0.57 0 0 0.50 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
16 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TB2022_43
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 296.4 · logP 1.83 · TPSA 100.3
52.9 0.69 2.4004 -1.2374 2 11.39 296.4 1.83 100.3 2.996 0.52 0.75 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
17 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_913
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 228.2 · logP 0.89 · TPSA 91.2
52.2 0.73 2.5670 -1.4931 0 18.39 228.2 0.89 91.2 2.495 0.55 0.39 0 0 0.65 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 9 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.4
T09
T09
18 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_ACDS_29
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 326.4 · logP 2.77 · TPSA 106.8
50.4 0.65 1.8826 -1.0031 1 7.47 326.4 2.77 106.8 3.078 0.41 0.58 0 0 0.54 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
19 3
Front 3
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_971
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 314.4 · logP 4.78 · TPSA 44.4
50.0 0.61 2.6671 -1.0453 0 6.31 314.4 4.78 44.4 3.015 0.37 0.48 0 0 0.51 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
20 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0411
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 313.4 · logP 0.81 · TPSA 147.1
53.1 0.71 1.8016 -1.2211 0 21.46 313.4 0.81 147.1 2.829 0.45 0.70 0 0 0.42 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 21.5
T09
T09
21 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
KB_Leish_37
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 302.4 · logP 2.74 · TPSA 92.0
49.9 0.58 3.0998 -1.0706 0 9.53 302.4 2.74 92.0 3.097 0.41 0.52 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 16 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
22 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_ACDS_26
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 433.1 · logP 5.26 · TPSA 57.6
46.8 0.67 1.7759 -1.0696 0 9.75 433.1 5.26 57.6 2.594 0.03 0.60 0 0 0.41 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
23 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
Z57449891
reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 361.2 · logP 4.30 · TPSA 58.2
41.6 0.61 2.8419 -1.1056 3 12.01 361.2 4.30 58.2 1.698 0.29 0.36 0 0 0.85 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 12.0
T09
T09
24 4
Front 4
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_978
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 318.4 · logP 5.06 · TPSA 23.4
48.9 0.65 2.0778 -1.0789 0 8.79 318.4 5.06 23.4 2.927 0.25 0.48 0 0 0.52 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 12 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
25 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
KB_HAT_83
well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 325.4 · logP 0.72 · TPSA 103.1
54.4 0.69 1.3946 -1.0709 0 18.58 325.4 0.72 103.1 3.841 0.58 0.59 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 18.6
T09
T09
26 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TB2022_45
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 323.4 · logP 1.73 · TPSA 116.1
55.7 0.65 2.1512 -1.0912 1 14.14 323.4 1.73 116.1 1.980 0.55 0.77 0 0 0.67 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 14.1
T09
T09
27 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0544
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 295.3 · logP -0.39 · TPSA 176.0
55.8 0.70 2.3149 -1.2648 0 32.32 295.3 -0.39 176.0 2.424 0.57 0.78 0 0 0.47 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 32.3
T09
T09
28 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
KB_chagas_174
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 330.4 · logP 3.58 · TPSA 65.7
49.1 0.58 2.6022 -0.9726 1 9.14 330.4 3.58 65.7 2.300 0.44 0.54 0 0 0.59 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 12 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
29 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
Z56964630
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 360.8 · logP 5.28 · TPSA 53.1
41.2 0.57 2.5601 -0.8930 2 13.67 360.8 5.28 53.1 2.217 0.03 0.68 0 0 0.38 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 13 clashes; 2 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 13.7
T09
T09
30 5
Front 5
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_973
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 330.4 · logP 5.25 · TPSA 31.2
47.9 0.65 3.2347 -1.2474 0 9.04 330.4 5.25 31.2 2.976 0.21 0.48 0 0 0.47 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 12 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
31 6
Front 6
D
Reject / artefact
Z147200608
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 301.3 · logP 1.30 · TPSA 113.8
54.6 0.66 2.3694 -1.1987 0 19.61 301.3 1.30 113.8 2.474 0.61 0.52 0 0 0.67 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 5 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 19.6
T09
T09
32 6
Front 6
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0823
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 280.3 · logP 0.02 · TPSA 150.0
58.4 0.67 2.5826 -1.2753 0 30.96 280.3 0.02 150.0 2.259 0.63 0.77 0 0 0.62 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 31.0
T09
T09
33 6
Front 6
D
Reject / artefact
OSA_Lib_301
well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 412.6 · logP 3.60 · TPSA 42.5
48.2 0.65 1.9978 -0.9211 0 14.07 412.6 3.60 42.5 4.885 0.38 0.62 0 0 0.56 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 12 clashes; 1 protein contact clash; moderate strain Δ 14.1
T09
T09
34 6
Front 6
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_Leishmania_466
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 318.4 · logP 3.85 · TPSA 44.8
47.6 0.56 2.7387 -0.9905 1 7.80 318.4 3.85 44.8 2.804 0.44 0.49 0 0 0.79 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
35 6
Front 6
D
Reject / artefact
KB_HAT_189
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 372.5 · logP 4.26 · TPSA 49.4
35.0 0.32 4.7788 -0.7033 2 11.08 372.5 4.26 49.4 2.334 0.25 0.43 0 0 0.74 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 16 clashes; 7 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
36 7
Front 7
D
Reject / artefact
NMT-TY0371
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 296.3 · logP -0.68 · TPSA 170.0
55.0 0.65 2.4517 -1.2221 0 22.17 296.3 -0.68 170.0 2.520 0.66 0.66 0 0 0.47 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Alerts x1, Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 22.2
T09
T09
37 7
Front 7
D
Reject / artefact
KB_Leish_102
well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 310.4 · logP 2.40 · TPSA 51.0
50.3 0.64 1.9288 -1.0604 0 9.79 310.4 2.40 51.0 4.004 0.44 0.49 0 0 0.81 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 5 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
38 7
Front 7
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TC1_133
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 368.3 · logP 5.82 · TPSA 33.6
45.2 0.62 1.6968 -0.9218 0 10.70 368.3 5.82 33.6 2.982 0.03 0.63 0 0 0.48 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 8 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
39 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
Z56891526
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 279.3 · logP 1.39 · TPSA 90.3
52.0 0.62 2.4453 -1.1712 0 26.13 279.3 1.39 90.3 3.061 0.64 0.48 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 5 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 26.1
T09
T09
40 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
TC107
well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 353.5 · logP 3.22 · TPSA 48.5
49.6 0.59 2.4298 -0.9580 0 22.10 353.5 3.22 48.5 4.586 0.47 0.63 0 0 0.92 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 9 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 22.1
T09
T09
41 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TB2022_42
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 295.3 · logP 2.41 · TPSA 99.1
55.2 0.60 3.2973 -1.2186 0 15.32 295.3 2.41 99.1 2.022 0.52 0.78 0 0 0.68 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 13 clashes; 5 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 15.3
T09
T09
42 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
Z127730398
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 299.4 · logP 4.96 · TPSA 37.8
47.7 0.52 3.6731 -1.0626 1 10.79 299.4 4.96 37.8 2.341 0.48 0.52 0 0 0.58 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 17 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes
T09
T09
43 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
ulfkktlib_1319
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 337.4 · logP 2.56 · TPSA 76.4
47.1 0.49 4.2282 -0.9758 0 21.04 337.4 2.56 76.4 2.085 0.41 0.45 0 0 0.72 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 7 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 21.0
T09
T09
44 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
Z29395300
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 327.4 · logP 2.58 · TPSA 83.6
46.1 0.61 2.4625 -1.0960 1 26.03 327.4 2.58 83.6 2.843 0.41 0.50 0 0 0.73 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 26.0
T09
T09
45 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
KB_HAT_186
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 473.2 · logP 3.08 · TPSA 74.4
43.1 0.63 2.5238 -1.1128 2 27.46 473.2 3.08 74.4 3.580 0.29 0.65 0 0 0.46 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 6 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 27.5
T09
T09
46 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
Z17465528
reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 362.5 · logP 3.28 · TPSA 73.8
42.7 0.58 3.0320 -1.0194 3 20.23 362.5 3.28 73.8 3.199 0.44 0.52 0 0 0.61 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 2 clashes; 9 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 20.2
T09
T09
47 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
Z56920485
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 347.4 · logP 3.09 · TPSA 90.3
49.8 0.61 2.6424 -1.0842 0 25.73 347.4 3.09 90.3 3.026 0.44 0.57 0 0 0.59 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 7 clashes; 4 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 25.7
T09
T09
48 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
OHD_TB2022_41
well-buried hydrophobics, native-like contacts, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 326.4 · logP 1.84 · TPSA 109.6
50.8 0.62 2.8310 -1.1013 2 26.50 326.4 1.84 109.6 3.016 0.55 0.80 0 0 0.66 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 10 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; high strain Δ 26.5
T09
T09
49 8
Front 8
D
Reject / artefact
OSA_Lib_67
well-buried hydrophobics
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 485.3 · logP 5.74 · TPSA 16.5
39.6 0.55 2.7977 -0.8763 0 14.56 485.3 5.74 16.5 5.157 0.00 0.58 0 0 0.57 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 11 clashes; 3 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 14.6
T09
T09
50 9
Front 9
D
Reject / artefact
Z88883573
well-buried hydrophobics, reasonable synthesis profile
reject · Major geometry or chemistry red flags make this pose unreliable for prioritization.
MW 316.4 · logP 2.68 · TPSA 75.3
50.0 0.56 3.1886 -1.1069 0 16.52 316.4 2.68 75.3 1.984 0.44 0.56 0 0 0.91 Not available
FreeSASA was expected, but no SASA metrics were cached for this pose.
Geometry warning, geometry warning; 9 clashes; 6 protein contact clashes; moderate strain Δ 16.5
How to build the score
Docking 28% · final rank, interaction-normalized score, raw docking score
Burial 18% · absolute exposed hydrophobic atom count (lower is better)
Strain 14% · strain delta, intra score, geometry sanity
Safety / EcoTox 18% · ADMET plus ecotox, reweighted toward cleaner liabilities
Synthesis 10% · SA score when available, otherwise Fsp3 proxy
Native similarity 12% · contact and H-bond recall when a native reference exists
Diversity shortlist 0% · cached shortlist already includes the novelty-aware selection step

How ranking works: first we build Pareto fronts from docking, burial, strain, safety/ecotox, synthesizability, and native-like interactions. Front 1 contains non-dominated ligands, meaning no other ligand is better in all tracked objectives at once. Inside each front, ligands are ordered by a compromise score, which is a weighted desirability score with explicit penalties for PAINS, reactivity, toxicity alerts, geometry warnings, excluded poses, and artifact annotations. The top 50 per target are then taken front-by-front; if the cut falls inside one front, the compromise score decides the boundary.

Methodology
1. Candidate definition. For each target we keep one best pose per ligand, so the shortlist is not inflated by many similar poses of the same compound.
2. Objective set. Each ligand is evaluated across docking quality, absolute nonpolar solvent exposure (`n_exposed`), conformational strain, native-like interaction similarity when a native reference exists, safety and ecotoxicology, synthesizability, and general developability indicators such as QED.
2a. SASA / burial source. The new `SASA source` column tells you whether burial-sensitive surface metrics were computed from `FreeSASA` (`FreeSASA`), approximated only from the contact-based exposure proxy because no surface calculation was possible (`Proxy only`), or expected but still unavailable (`Not available`). Pareto ranking still uses the absolute `n_exposed` burial proxy everywhere, but `FreeSASA` gives extra physical context for how trustworthy the burial picture is.
3. Liability penalties. PAINS motifs, reactive groups, toxicity alerts, artifact annotations, geometry warnings, and excluded-pose flags do not automatically remove a ligand, but they reduce its compromise score and are exposed explicitly in the table.
4. Pareto ranking. A ligand is placed on Pareto front 1 when no other ligand for the same target is better across all tracked objectives at once. Lower front number means a more balanced profile, not just a stronger docking score.
5. Confidence / reliability. `A` means the ligand is internally consistent across docking, geometry, liabilities, and SASA availability. `B` means promising but still worth inspection. `C` flags provisional hits with clashes, moderate strain, or missing SASA. `D` is reserved for clear artefacts or chemically unreliable poses that should not be trusted without rescue evidence.
6. Compromise score. Inside each Pareto front we apply a weighted desirability score to prioritize practical ligands. The current formula is `100 x clamp(weighted positive score - liability penalty - missing-data penalty)`, where the weighted positive score uses docking `28%`, burial `18%`, strain `14%`, safety/ecotox `18%`, synthesis `10%`, and native similarity `12%` when a native reference exists.
7. Component details. The docking component itself is a weighted mix of `final_rank_score` `55%`, `score_inter_norm` `30%`, and raw docking `score` `15%`. Strain combines `strain_delta` `55%`, `score_intra_norm` `30%`, and geometry sanity `15%`. Liability penalties are then added for PAINS, reactivity, toxicity alerts, excluded poses, artifact flags, and failed geometry checks.
8. SA score / SA column. This column shows the raw synthesis-related metric stored for the ligand. When a direct SA score is available, it is preferred; otherwise a proxy fallback is used. The table shows that raw value for transparency, but ranking uses the normalized `synth_component`, so the compromise score always interprets a better synthesis profile as a higher contribution.
9. Final shortlist. The top 50 ligands per target are taken front-by-front. If the cutoff falls inside one front, the compromise score determines which ligands stay in the visible shortlist.
10. Diversity-aware selection. The visible top 50 is not a simple first-50 truncation. After Pareto and compromise scoring we run a novelty-aware selection step that favours ligands which add scaffold or fingerprint diversity, so near-duplicate analogs do not dominate the shortlist.
How to read the table. `Pareto` shows the non-dominated layer, `Compromise` is the within-front ordering score, `n_exposed` is an absolute burial proxy where lower is better, `Strain dE` captures conformational stress, and the colored dots provide a quick green/orange/red cue for each property.
How to use selections. You can mark compounds row-by-row, save them into `Current`, `Temp`, or global sets `A/B/C`, export them to `SDF`, `XLSX`, or `CSV`, and send the selected subset straight into downstream analysis pages for histograms, projections, and other exploratory views.